Please realize that these research articles contain NO theories or models as such, although some do make connections to certain theories of particle physics. What is presented is not theorizing or ad hoc speculation but something far more significant and convincing: rigorous analysis whose conclusions are as irrefutable as any proof of an axiom of Euclidean geometry. The wondrous, mathematical properties of truly sacred geometries (as opposed to what many books and websites glibly refer to as such without evidence) speak to their transcendental origin. Ostensible evidence of divine design should not be ignored simply because of an unwillingness to face the philosophical consequences of its existence or because of fear of criticism and ridicule by one's friends and colleagues if one endorses it, as is the norm in academic circles. The research presented here is not subject to the limitations of controversial, scientific theorizing; the sceptic cannot question whether it is true or falsifiable, for it does not amount to a mere theory or speculative model to be tested by experiments. What is being discussed is far more profound. Any criticism he may make that no testifiable predictions are offered is invalid because it fails to understand that what this website offers is not a mere theory with hypotheses or assumptions that need testing. Instead, it provides rigorous, mathematical analysis of various objects traditionally regarded as examples of sacred geometry (as well as some objects proved here to have this status). This analysis yields undeniable evidence that these objects possess in common so many properties analogous to certain paranormal observations of subatomic particles and to the group mathematics underlying superstrings that it is implausible in the extreme to dismiss them as due only to coincidence. All sceptics can do is to admit that the exact, mathematical results demonstrating detailed parallels between sacred geometries are indicative of an underlying, coherent design of transcendental origin, for there is no other sensible explanation available to them. Readers must draw their own conclusions from the emergence of such spectacular design in these research articles. In particular, sceptics must ask themselves how it can exist at all in objects with an ancient, religious provenance, given their adherence to a philosophical view that either denies or is agnostic towards the age-old question of the existence of God. This beautiful design has not been invented by the author; it just is — and too much so to be due to chance. That existence needs explanation, not absurd appeals to a miraculous series of coincidences. Religion and science are complementary, not antithetical. They are like the poles of a magnet. The articles presented here reveal the nature of this magnet.