<< Previous 1... 2 3 [4] 5 6 ...19 Next >> |

Most books and websites devoted to sacred geometry never reveal the true reason why the Platonic
solids are an example of "sacred geometry." They refer, of course, to Plato's book *Timaeus*, his exposition
on cosmology, where the Greek philosopher, heavily borrowing from the ideas of Pythagoras, sets out the notion that
the particles making up the elements Earth, Water, Air & Fire have the respective shapes of the cube,
icosahedron, octahedron & tetrahedron. The Pythagoreans associated the fifth regular polyhedron, the
dodecahedron, with the celestial sphere because of the approximation of its shape to that of a sphere. Following
the introduction by Aristotle of Aether, the fifth Element, it came to be associated with this Element. These
websites also point out how prevalent these shapes are in nature and how the Golden Ratio displayed in their
geometry manifests in the proportions of many living things, as though these examples supposedly used by God to
create everything were enough to prove their sacred nature! But such things, however beautiful and ubiquitous, do
not constitute *proof* that the Platonic solids possess sacred geometry. No one now believes that atoms
themselves take the form of the regular polyhedra, although their aggregation in crystals do, indeed, often show
these shapes for reasons that are well understood by chemists and physicists. What determines whether an object has
*sacred* geometry is the possession of the universal, mathematical design or pattern found in the
sacred geometries of religions and parameterised by the *same* set of numbers. This pattern has been
explored in depth in the author's new book.

Like any other example of sacred geometry, the *real* quality of "sacredness" in the
Platonic solids is revealed by uncovering the numbers that they embody. Only after they have been extracted and
found to be identical to the set of numbers in other sacred geometries can one start to claim that this congruence
implies the existence of a universal, mathematical pattern which originates in the Mind of God and, therefore, that
the geometry is, indeed, sacred because it encapsulates — as a Platonist would say — the archetypal "Ideas" of God.
The numbers that characterize the Platonic solids are the **50** gematria number values of the
ten Sephiroth in the four Worlds (see table). As Plato's Ideas originate in the Archetypal World (Atziluth), it is
not surprising that the numbers embodied in the ten Divine Names — the essence of the Sephiroth in Atziluth —
should make a strong presence in quantifying the properties of such archetypal objects. The most obvious
example of this is ELOHIM, the Godname of Binah, which embodies the divine archetypes of "form," or pattern of
relationship, at its most basic level of meaning. Its gematria number value is **50**, which
is both the number of vertices of the five Platonic solids and the number of their faces — the basic geometrical
elements that determine their *shape* in 3-dimensional space. Ways in which all the Godnames
mathematically express their properties are discussed at length in Article 3 (WEB, PDF).

There are two ways of transforming straight-line, geometrical objects, having reduced them to triangles:

1. turn the triangles into Pythagorean (1st-order) tetractyses, then 2nd-order tetractyses, etc;

2. turn the triangles into type A triangles, type B triangles, etc by dividing them into their three sectors,
each sector into three sectors, and so on.

Counting the different classes of yods (corners of tetractyses, hexagonal yods, boundary yods,
interior yods, etc) generates a set of numbers that will have their counterparts in other sacred geometries if the
object in question possesses sacred geometry. Not only this, if these numbers display certain relationships between
them that are found in other sacred geometries as well, this enables the object to be identifed as having sacred
geometry and therefore embodying numbers of scientific or metaphysical significance. Finally, the properties of
such holistic objects will always be mathematically *beautiful*. Perfection and beauty are the *sine qua
non* of Divine Truth. They are the signature of sacred geometry. This beauty is conceptual, not
necessarily aesthetic. It is therefore harder to identify, even with the eye of a mathematician. What is
needed is a correctly trained eye. University departments do not offer courses in such training.

In the following pages, the true sacred geometry of the Platonic solids will be partly
established by comparing their properties with those of the Tree of Life and then showing that they are analogous.
Their correspondence with other sacred geometries is analysed in the section **Correspondences**.

<< Previous 1... 2 3 [4] 5 6 ...19 Next >> |